Toni Morrison’s rejection letters

No, not the letters she received as a writer querying her own work, but those she wrote to authors when she was an editor at Random House (back in the day when authors could/would directly query the publisher). Los Angeles Book Review has an interesting post, not just on that collection and other correspondence she wrote as an editor and her responses to the consolidation of the publishing houses (which gained steam during that period, the 1970’s) and the ill-effects of this consolidation on books.

But perhaps most interesting is the craft advice of her letters. This bit caught my eye:

What Morrison repeatedly stressed, trusting her exceptional acuity as both a reader and writer, is that writing is a skill of its own—one that doesn’t automatically follow from intellectual brilliance, nor from simply being an interesting or important person. She told one young writer that his ideas were good, but warned that concept was the first and lowest hurdle he would face:

“Your work needs force—some manner of making these potentially powerful characters alive and of giving texture to the setting. Giving details about the people—more than what they look like—what idiosyncrasies they have, what distinguished mannerism—and details about where the action takes place: what is in the room, what is the light like, the smells, etc.—all of that would give us texture and tone.”

I do recommend hopping over and taking at look at the whole thing on LABR.

So you got an offer…

Might as well round up the week with one last WriterUnboxed post. Kasey LeBlanc posted Tuesday What to Do After Receiving an Offer of Representation: A Comprehensive Action Plan.” It looks very  valuable, alas not (yet) for me. My most recent reject arrived Monday. It didn’t really impact me emotionally, because it was a query 206 days old and one I had marked CNR (Closed, no response) at 120 days (the default CNR on QueryTracker) so had long given up on it. BTW, QueryTracker itself is a very valuable tool when querying agents. I’d highly recommend the paid version (which gives access to further data about agents), though there is a free version. The paid is only $25 a year and supports a valuable service.